Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Google I/O 2013: What You Need to Know

Friday, May 17th, 2013

google i/o 2013

This week is one of those big ones for the tech world: the week of Google I/O, Google’s developer conference at the Moscone Center in San Francisco. In addition to the dozens of technical sessions, lab sessions, and demonstrations of Google technologies such as Android, Chrome, and APIs, Google had a lot of announcements about the future of their products.

Similar to Apple, Google announces product updates and news during the keynote at the beginning of the conference. The massive 3.5-hour keynote was full of important statistics about Google’s impact across different products and sneak previews of new updates and features to those same products.

It’s a lot of information to take in, to say the least, so we put together an outline of the important updates from the keynotes and a few other tidbits of information from I/O:

(more…)

Insights from ad:tech San Francisco Day 2 Opening Keynote

Wednesday, April 10th, 2013

We’re back for Day 2 of ad:tech San Francisco! We had a great time yesterday, and are looking forward to another great day today. Today’s opening keynote was given by the SVP of Advertising at Google, Susan Wojcicki. Her presentation went through the importance of advertising to the internet. She described what digital advertising was in the past, what it is now, and five elements of the future of digital advertising.

Towards the end of the keynote, she was joined by Google’s Vice President of Display Advertising, Neal Mohan. They did a short Q&A, which included a question about Google’s relationship with agencies and how beneficial that relationship can now be.

Once again, we put together a Storify of tweets of our favorite insights from the presentation. For more about our ad:tech experience, you can follow @eZangaInc on Twitter.

(more…)

The Demise of Google Reader

Friday, March 15th, 2013

rip google readerWhere do you get your news these days? Before social media exploded, most people found online reading material by dutifully checking their favorite websites or importing their feeds into an RSS reader.

Now, people can find news, information, and entertainment on social media. They see what’s trending on Twitter, look at what their friends are sharing on Facebook, browse Reddit, etc. And this change causes casualties.

Google has announced that they will be killing off Google Reader, probably the most popular and widely used RSS reader. The company has set a closure to be scheduled for July, 1st, 2013, in order to further implement their “spring cleaning,” which also includes shutting down 7 other services.

The official Google Blog explained, “we need to focus—otherwise we spread ourselves too thin and lack impact. So today we’re announcing some more closures, bringing the total to 70 features or services closed since our spring cleaning began in 2011.”

Google Reader users are bummed, to say the least. Just hours after the announcement, Google Reader quickly rose to the top worldwide trending topics, and has remained a nearly constant trending topic since the news broke on Wednesday.

(more…)

Is Microsoft’s Scroogled Campaign a Complete Flop?

Friday, February 15th, 2013

scroogledMicrosoft is putting in every ounce of effort they have left to triumph over the mighty Google. However, are their efforts succeeding? The answer to that is a big, fat N-O.

We first saw the smear campaign against Google back in November for the holiday season. The campaign entitled “Don’t get Scroogled” was an attack promoting Microsoft’s Bing search engine over Google search. The series of advertisements explained to users that Google displays product results based on merchants that pay a fee, meaning that the best prices and/or products can go unseen.

Microsoft’s Bing claims they do not partake in product listing advertising, but simply connect the user with the best, most relevant search results. Senior Director Stefan Weitz of Bing fires a direct attack on Google with this statement:

“Bing Shopping results are high quality and are determined by which products are most relevant to the shopper’s search. Bing results incorporate top deals from merchants across the web and the rankings you see aren’t dependent on which advertisers paid to have their products listed. Bing also provides tools…to help consumers easily find what they’re looking for – and get a great deal without having to dig through a ton of advertisements.”

(more…)

Google’s New Image Search – A More Efficient Way to Search

Friday, January 25th, 2013

redesigned google image searchA recent announcement from Google has audiences buzzing with promises of a new and improved image search. Google claims that this makeover will give users an experience that is both faster and more effective for them to use.

The new image search interface comes with several features for users to look forward to in the next few days that are both aesthetically pleasing and easier to navigate.

So, what changes can be expected from this new image search? We’ve outlined some of them for you here:

(more…)

Online Advertising in the 2012 Elections

Friday, September 7th, 2012

Without a doubt, this year’s elections will be influenced by digital media more than any past races. Sure, we were entering a digital era back in 2008, but by now the Internet follows us wherever we go and whatever we do. We rely on computers and Internet connections so much more than we did the last time we voted for a president.

Online advertising and search engine marketing have also grown. According to SEMPO’s annual SEM reports, search engine marketing was approximately a $13.5 million industry in 2008. Despite the economic conditions of the U.S., it is an industry that has continually grown.

As people are learning about political candidates and deciding who to vote for, they will go online to look for more information. They will probably start off with a search on Google or another search engine. This has changed the nature of political advertising, and candidates can take advantage of political online advertising and paid search in several ways. Even in May, online ad spend for the election was seven times higher than it was in 2008. This post will explore different tools and strategies that candidates are using to campaign in this year’s election.

Targeting

One advantage of politicians advertising online as opposed to in traditional media is the ability to target advertisements to specific audiences. Politicians can target a specific demographic and then tailor the advertisement accordingly. For example, instead of including the URL for a candidate’s website in all advertisements, different ads can highlight different components of the campaign and his/her stance on certain issues. This can be especially effective in appealing to swing voters. These voters may not know who they are voting for, but know what issues they care about and will search to find out each candidate’s stance on those issues.

A new Google AdWords feature also allows politicians to target ad campaigns by congressional district, which will surely change the online marketing strategies of local politicians. Normally, ads can be geotargeted by ZIP code, but congressional districts change with census results every 10 years and don’t necessarily line up with ZIP codes. This eliminates the risk of paying for advertisements shown to searchers in other districts that wouldn’t even be able to vote for the candidate. In addition to this tool, Google has launched an entire “Four Screens to Victory” guide to help candidates connect with voters via TV, personal computers, mobile devices, and tablets.

Keyword Bidding

The keywords candidates use can also strengthen their political campaign. By effectively bidding on a variety of different keywords highlighting different parts of their campaign, political candidates can both reach larger audiences and lead searchers to specific areas of their websites. For example, a Search Engine Watch article from August looked at the keyword bidding habits of the Obama and Romney campaigns.

The author of the article found that both candidates bid on names other than their own. One example is the Romney campaign bidding on Mike Huckabee’s name. By bidding on the names of other politicians that endorse him, he may be trying to rally the supporters of his allies.

Now, let’s look at Obama. While it looks like most of Romney’s search ads lead to his campaign’s home page, Obama leads searchers to several areas of his website, one of which talks about Romney’s economics. It looks like both candidates bid on keywords related to the other’s name.

Once the conventions are over and election day gets closer, we’ll likely see candidates start to change their strategies and keywords. What do you think they will be?

Like what you’ve read? Click here to subscribe to this blog!

Facebook Joins NBC’s Olympics Party

Friday, July 13th, 2012

 

Facebook has been invited to NBC’s 2012 Olympics broadcasting party. The attendee list is small – Google, NBC and Facebook. The social network partnership adds exclusivity to the event by creating a go to spot for trending information and real-time updates for the events. Fans who “like” the 2012 Olympic Facebook Page gain access to its newest data tool, Talk Meter.

The “Talk Meter” will be introduced via Facebook to track the specific sports and athletes Facebookers are talking about. According to The New York Times, Facebook’s user population has grown from 100 million to 900 million since 2008, the year of the Beijing Summer Games. The “Talk Meter,” will give NBC a sizeable insight into the amount of coverage it should provide for each events. The conversations that occur on Facebook will steer the selections for NBC’s online streaming coverage.

The TV Network and the Social Network announced their partnership this past Wednesday. Shortly after, NBC announced that it has launched two “NBC Olympics On The Go” apps for the iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and for some Android gadgets. The apps, NBC Olympics Live Extra and NBC Olympics will provide live streaming coverage of the Games, which will now give Apple and Android device users even more ways to tune into the predicted 3,500 hours of coverage.

 

As a consumer – do you think that NBC, Google and Facebook should join ranks with another channel to enhance the viewer experience? Will you tune into Talk Meter?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Like what you’ve read? Click here to subscribe to this blog!

Olympic War Games: NBC and Google Prep For Hackers

Friday, July 6th, 2012

 

The 2012 Summer Olympic Games are swiftly approaching and media juggernaut NBC and internet titan Google have been preparing with simulated “war games”. The “war games” pose as cyber attacks and other digital impasses that could threaten the highly anticipated online coverage of the 2012 Summer Olympic Games. The events will last for seventeen days, from July 27th to August 12th in London, England. NBC is expecting millions to tune into their various platforms to watch the live coverage. To reinforce security, Google will be supervising the streams.

The 2008 Beijing Games pulled in 75.5 million video streams online. The success of those games spurred NBC onto new successes already this year as it streamed the Super Bowl online for the first time to 2.1 million streams. NBC is hoping to beat the Beijing tally and estimates 3,500 hours of coverage. This enormous undertaking requires extra digital “hands” touching the coverage, which means additional places for err.

The Wall Street Journal’s CIO Journal states,

“The 17-day games will be captured in London and then sent to NBC’s New York and Stamford, Conn., offices, where advertising will be inserted. The footage will then go to Google’s offices in San Bruno, Calif., where it will be prepped for online and streamed across the search giant’s networks to several NBC sites. Cable or satellite subscribers will be able to go online to watch the entirety of the games live or in replay.”

The Olympic Games streams will be popular targets for both fans and hackers during the seventeen days. As such, the two companies are using these staged games to prepare for possible future hacker attacks, viewer traffic shifts, and hardware malfunctions. The “war games” have already succeeded in three countries as NBC and Google attempt to show their ability to respond to these attacks quickly and effectively. PaidContent finds that 71% of U.S. citizens intend on following the Olympics on TV, while only a shockingly low 16% of stateside people will watch it on a PC.

Where will you watch the Olympics?

A. Television

B. The Internet

C. Mobile Device

D. All Of The Above

Like what you’ve read? Click here to subscribe to this blog!

eZanga Attends SMX Advanced 2012

Wednesday, June 6th, 2012

The Bell Harbor International Conference Center in Seattle, Washington is swarming with exceptionally knowledgeable internet marketers at SMX Advanced 2012 this week.

Hosted by Third Door Media (the company behind Search Engine Land), SMX Advanced is a condensed two day event designed to fuse the networks of the brightest minds in the industry.  With an emphasis on building relationships, jam-packed sessions incorporate enlightening workshops with familiar moderators and distinguished keynote speakers.  The event focuses on four major themes: SEO, paid search, mobile and an advanced blend of marketing strategies titled “Hardcore”.  Popular sessions highlight the best tactics and tools for PPC, remarketing, analytics and the integration of search and social. The packed workshops and engaging networking events have created a buzzing excitement on live blogs, Twitter, Facebook and even Google+! eZanga marketers are participating in the enthusiasm, attending the sold out sessions and utilizing the event’s Twitter hashtag, #SMX.

The most talked about keynote has been the “You & A” with Google’s web spam team leader, Matt Cutts. Moderated by Search Engine Land’s Danny Sullivan, the audience had the ability to ask Matt questions about hot topics such as the latest Penguin updates, the Knowledge Graph, the War on Spam and Google Plus. Read Matt McGee’s live blog of the entire session here.

 

 Stay tuned for more updates on SMX Advanced 2012 in Seattle, Washington!

Is YouTube saying goodbye to “Thumbs Down”?

Thursday, May 3rd, 2012

When Google originally said that Google+ would become a social layer on top of everything else the company does, they weren’t kidding around. From the +1 button to Search, Plus Your World, Google is adding Google+ integration to as many of their products as possible. But at what expense?

Once again, Google has angered an actor from Start Trek. Yesterday, Wil Wheaton posted on Tumblr (warning: profanity) about a change he noticed while watching videos on YouTube. Instead of the ‘thumbs up’ and ‘thumbs down’ icons to vote on a video, he saw a Google+ ‘Like’ button.

Google has told Danny Sullivan, “We are currently running experiments showing different Google+ buttons in YouTube in order to provide the best user experience.” I took a look at screenshots of the buttons being tested, and none of them seem to have a button equivalent to the ‘thumbs down.’

A lot of people are angry because with these new buttons, only Google+ users will be able to vote on YouTube videos. I’m not disagreeing with them, but am more drawn to the fact that there will be no “1-click” way to say that you don’t like the video.

If you wanted to express negative feedback, you would have to comment. After years of Facebook users begging for a ‘dislike’ button, why would they remove their equivalent to it?

I’m starting to worry that it’s going to become harder to give negative feedback on social networks. While it may not be a lot of work to type out your comment and post it, why is it so much easier to agree with content than it is to disagree?

Video comments seem to be a place for users with strong opinions, whether they are positive or negative. This is because those without strong opinions don’t want to take the time to type out their thoughts, which then may be attacked by other users. If you just like a video a little bit, it’s much easier to click the ‘thumbs up’ or ‘thumbs down’ button and move on to another video.

Why do social networks make it so easy and quick to give content positive feedback, but not negative? Do you agree that both opinions should have 1-click options? Let us know in the comments!

Like what you’ve read? Click here to subscribe to this blog!